Sonia Sotomayor
June 3, 2009
I will proceed, unchallenged I suspect, on the assumption that this woman is a Roman Catholic. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence to that effect, although an outside observer certainly does not know the heart (see “David Souter”) of a Supreme Court nominee.
This means that she is a follower of a religion which dictates, as its highest profile social position, that abortion is murder.
I will further assume that this woman is “pro-choice,” which is to say pro-abortion, which is to further say (according to her own religion) pro-murder. Trust me, if she wasn’t “pro-choice,” she wouldn’t have been nominated by President Carpathia.
Now you see where I’m headed.
So here’s your Chinese menu:
1. Hypocrite
2. Dissembler
3. Dissociater
4. Liar
5. Pimp
6. Tim Kaine fan (http://layinablog.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/virginias-executive-hypocrite-is-at-it-again/)
7. Some or all of the above
I’m just saying, you know? Because I promise you logic.
June 4, 2009 at 17:32
And as soon as I apply myself to a dictionary, I may get back to you…you, you, you BIG WORD PERSON.
June 4, 2009 at 12:15
You are asking me to apply logic to the motives of an institution which teaches, among other things, transubstantiation and divine parthenogenesis.
Sorry; no can do.
June 3, 2009 at 19:49
You have made good on your promise. But she’s not the first to compromise their beliefs for a position.
‘Splain something to me though? After seeing the church’s reaction to the PC/Notre Dame deal, why isn’t there a similar reaction when one of their own is put in a position to be beholding to him in matters where their agendas conflict? More logic,please.