I Need Your Help Again…

How is it that if some asshole yells, e.g., ”Faggot!” or “Nigger!” and then murders the object of his misguided standard, he is guilty of a hate crime, but when another, Muslim asshole yells “Allahu Akhbar!” and then murders 13 and wounds 30 more, our president doesn’t want us “jumping to conclusions” that he might be a terrorist?

I always felt that if you murdered (and I use the term “murder” instead of kill for the obvious legal reason) someone, regardless of the reason, you are either crazy, or you hate them, or both.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/11/10/stiletto-hasan-crazy-terrorist-jihadi-military/

Well? I’m waiting.

Asshole Of The Week…

 Nidal Malik Hasan; no elaboration necessary.

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/national/article/army_closes_base_at_fort_hood_texas_amid_reports_that_several_people_have_b/303868/

Here’s dessert; just because:

Separated at birth?

Evolution Vs. Creation…

I’ll sum up a dandy exchange I had with a creationist stranger on one of my brothers’ facebook page, as he was trying to support creation “science”:

Creationist stranger: “Now as for your definition of ’science,’ be aware that the word has several definitions. People tend to choose the definition that suits their belief-system best. But creationism and evolutionism are equally scientific.”

“I guess it depends on what the definition of  ’is’  is.”—Bill Clinton

Creationist stranger: “They (evolutionists) refuse to accept a supernatural (italics added) explanation, no matter WHAT.”

Yes, I do indeed, in matters of science anyway. And therein I rest my case.

No Word On This Yet…

http://layinablog.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/let-me-save-you-some-time/

Does Anyone Still Think…(pt 2)

…that we’re not still at war with radical Islam?

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/09/29/terrorist-bombing-of-skyscraper-in-dallas-thwarted-by-fbi-local-cops/

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555340,00.html

Does Anyone Still Think…

…that we’re not still at war with radical Islam?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,547342,00.html?test=latestnews

I guarantee you that the CIA was in on uncovering this. That’d be the same CIA whose agents Obama is attempting to emasculate with his policy of prosecutions for legal, necessary, and fruitful interrogations.

No mention of this on the front page of MSNBC.com, of course. Keith Olbermann thought it un-newsworthy.

“Hmmm” Revisited…

http://layinablog.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/hmmm/

I am on the record blogferring in other posts to Obama as “President Carpathia” and “Baracolae Obama,” as well as other less flattering appellations.

And now (imagine Stewie voice here) I have been vindicated! Victory is mine!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXMAnlMmEPw&eurl

I don’t know if any of this is valid, and I won’t much care until such time as an unimpeachable authority (say, Megyn Kelly) produces unassailable evidence (say, photographs of a presidential toenail fungus spelling out “666″) of it. But it sure makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

  

Coincidence? I THINK NOT!!!

Here’s dessert:

http://www.amazon.com/Presidents-Secret-Service-Behind-Protect/dp/0307461351

Today I saw this guy Kessler interviewed on tv, and among the things he related were that Jimmy Carter used to make sure that the press noticed him going to work (such as it was) at 5 a.m., whereupon he promptly hit the couch for a long nap. He also related that the Secret Service “despised” Carter, who apparently wanted nothing to do with them. They should have granted his wish.

My next read.

Sonia Sotomayor

I will proceed, unchallenged I suspect, on the assumption that this woman is a Roman Catholic. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence to that effect, although an outside observer certainly does not know the heart (see “David Souter”) of a Supreme Court nominee.

This means that she is a follower of a religion which dictates, as its highest profile social position, that abortion is murder.

I will further assume that this woman is “pro-choice,” which is to say pro-abortion, which is to further say (according to her own religion) pro-murder. Trust me, if she wasn’t “pro-choice,” she wouldn’t have been nominated by President Carpathia.

Now you see where I’m headed.

So here’s your Chinese menu:

1. Hypocrite

2. Dissembler

3. Dissociater

4. Liar

5. Pimp

6. Tim Kaine fan (http://layinablog.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/virginias-executive-hypocrite-is-at-it-again/)

7. Some or all of the above

I’m just saying, you know? Because I promise you logic.

Notre Dame Versus Catholics? What?

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gyl9KAUtviW6HAJsyN6fiuaGghaQD97761D80

Interesting little skirmish here. What I love is that, for the first time in his presidency, Obama comes out smelling like a rose. Relatively speaking, of course. But only because he kept his pie hole shut. So far.

The militant “Catholics” who are opposing Obama’s address are, quite simply, denying the principle of free speech, a time-honored “Catholic” tradition—the denial, not the principle. But why in the name of the beard of Zeus would they want to forfeit the opportunity to hear one of the finest orators in recent political history speak? Wait…oh, never mind. Anyway, there’s no question that it’s a feather in Notre Dame’s pope hat to land the prez-o-dint for this gig. But because he doesn’t philosophically agree with Holy Mother Church’s (man, I love using that phrase) pro-life stance, some of the loyal want to abort his speaking engagement.

This, mind you, in spite of the fact that “Catholics” voted 55-45 for Obama in November. Clearly there is some disconnect in the ranks. And it is another example of how the “Catholics” have little regard for our rule of law when it conflicts with their agenda: see illegal immigration (http://layinablog.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/those-wacky-catholics-are-at-it-again/).

From the AP article: “Five years ago, bishops adopted a statement that declared: ‘The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.’” Hmmmm…does not electing Obama president constitute an award or honor? Those bishops must be sitting around in their self-celebrating pansy ass nightgowns wringing their hands over this one. No, I sit corrected, they are not. Because it is Obama’s policies that will bring more money into the coffers. And that’s what it’s all about.

Dessert: Doesn’t top cookie baker Bishop (I love this too, as bishop is a commonly used synonym for a dick) D’Arcy, pictured here:

 remind you of actor (Walking Tall, Cape Fear) Joe Don Baker

?

Or is it just me?

Let Me Save You Some Time…

“Virginia Man to Search for Noah’s Ark in Turkey”

It’s just behind the giblets.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,486684,00.html

Gadzooks, I’m sick of this nonsense. I’ll make this promise right now: if this lunatic finds anything on Mt. Ararat remotely resembling a large boat, I swear that I will renounce atheism and devote the remainder of my life to the service of the Hebrew God.

Except during 24.

Two Catholic Posts In A Row?

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aGSJzqaJm_b0&refer=europe

Yeah, no one else ever predicted that we might ever have some economic troubles, umhmmm. And our economy is “undisciplined?” Compared to what, the highly disciplined way the Vatican has dealt with its pedophile employees?

I’ll boil this down for you: the Vatican is making herr pope out to be a man of supernatural foresight, thereby paving the way for a declaration of one of the 2 “miracles” necessary for him to be kicked up to saint status someday. And I say fine, the sooner the better. You heard it here first.

Those Wacky Catholics Are At It Again…

http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-11-14-0035.html

“Reverend” Newman would do well to consult with the hierarchy before he oinks out statements like this. What he would find is that the truth of Vatican preference is much sicker than his own edict.

The Catholic Church wants nothing more than for us to have whichever president is going to allow the most Latino aliens, illegal or not, entry into this country. That’d be Obama. Latinos are predominately loyal Catholics and are even more hyperbreeding than our domestic ones. As they prosper in our economy, the funds that they don’t send back to their own miserable sewers of nations will find their way into the coffers of “Holy Mother Church”.

I.e., Newman might not want to alienate Obama voters. The pope is gonna have a cow.

Another Priest…

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,436414,00.html

Perhaps the scariest part of this is that the ”Holy Mother Church” finds it necessary to run a psychiatric care center devoted to its clergy.

Now, Wait Just A Minute…

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,409766,00.html

I already did this…

http://layinablog.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/my-favorite-nuns/

Those wacky Cathaholicks; you never know what they’re gonna do next.

“Jesus, You Complete Her” (8/6/08) Revisited…

http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/search.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-08-16-0148.html

1. This is front page Metro section news? Is there that little of import in our great metropolis that this deserves this kind of coverage?

2. “I wanted to give God all of me, that I wanted to devote all my time and energy to prayer, ministry and outreach, and the only way for that to happen was to remain single. With a husband and children, my time and attention would have been divided.” Which is to say that married clergy (and most of them are married, because most religions don’t buy into the medieval greed that is the reason Catholicism prohibits it*) are not doing their jobs?

3. “Having a ‘bridal shower’ party.” I won’t take the cheap shot here; for the dull, think “2 triple A coppertops.”

4. “The vocation of consecrated virginity has its ups and downs.” But evidently not its ins and outs. Guess I made up for not taking that cheap shot. Sorry.

5. “Dating is a funny term. I cannot ‘date’ someone in a romantic way — i.e., I am not going to be found at lookout point with anyone.” Perhaps the root of part of the problem lies here…her first impression of dating involves being taken parking. Icky!

Okay, I’ll shut up. You get the idea. Wasn’t one top of the fold article about this maladjusted woman enough?

*They buy into every other type of greed, though. But to the point: back in those good old days, the first born son inherited everything upon death of the father. Priesthood was often the best means of having food and shelter in those days, as Holy Mother Church then as now placed a premium on gouging the lay folk (To wit: the sale of so-called icons and indulgences, for starters) and was thereby able to provide generously for its officers. So by decreeing that entrants into the priesthood remain single, it guaranteed itself a steady stream of estate assets to fund its tyranny.