Billy Dee Williams, Back On Top…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgiCX_y1BW8

Here’s dessert:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/14/the-7-most-inappropriate_n_286223.html?slidenumber=3#slide_image

Michael Vick, Robin Starr, and My Buddy Michael Paul Williams…

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/columnists_news/article/MIKE29_20090828-220405/289141/#comments

Let’s do the article first:

MPW is right. There, I said it. And man, does it hurt.

Here’s the key: “In the aftermath, I’m left with the nagging feeling that Starr never intended for anyone outside the SPCA family to find out what happened to Louie.”

Absolutely correct. Although I’m sure there was no intent involved, there was certainly negligence. It’s like this: Mr. Starr either loaded the dog up for Ms. Starr regularly, in which case she should have known it was back there, or he did not, in which case he should have told her he did it on that day, which he did not. THAT is negligence. And as Mr. Benjamin points out, the event is legally actionable.

And, surprisingly, to his credit, MPW begins his article with the phrase “dog killer Michael Vick.” I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Now, on to the video:

1. Lose the dramatic musical intro, Mike. This isn’t Shakespeare you’re doing here.

2. :17—All of the sudden Vick is just an “animal abuser.” When did “killer” and “abuser” become synonomous?

3. :58—MPW “a bit puzzled?” NO, SAY IT AIN’T SO!!!

4. 1:10—Does MPW really need to glance at the prompter to be sure he gets his name right? Wait, he’s been looking at the prompter the whole time. So what got his attention, a cockroach scurrying across the floor? It is a question that will likely remain unanswered for time immemorial.

This post approved by Clancy.

Can You Imagine The Outrage…

…if a Republican had said this?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/19/obama-compares-bowling-score-special-olympics-tonight/100days/

Keith Olbermann would have vapor locked.

Hope and change.